LEINSTER COACH STUART Lancaster wants the controversial captain’s challenge rule currently being trialled in the Rainbow Cup to be scrapped, following another weekend of fixtures marred by the amount of in-game stoppages and interventions.
Leinster’s Rainbow Cup defeat to Glasgow Warriors last Friday night was the latest in a series of games subject to multiple TMO checks and stoppages throughout the contest, resulting in another frustrating watch.
There are concerns the amount of in-game stoppages is damaging the quality of games, with the captain’s challenge only adding to the issue.
Leinster’s game in Glasgow was just one example last weekend – with the second half of the Rainbow Cup meeting of Cardiff Blues and Zebre on Saturday lasting 67 minutes.
And Lancaster says the first thing he would do to improve the game as a spectacle is remove some of the current rules being trialled in the Rainbow Cup.
“Get rid of the captain’s challenge,” Lancaster replied when asked how he’d go about improving the games.
“I remember I was at a World Rugby meeting with England in 2014 and I remember this captain’s challenge notion being brought up then, and I remember thinking to myself, ‘This is crazy, why would we want to go down this route as a sport?’
“Anyway, I didn’t hear any more of it and suddenly it’s reappeared. I just think with the advent of TMOs, captain’s challenges, and a couple of other things, I think, one, it has created a lot of dead time in the games. Probably more importantly, maybe because there are no fans there, it has created integrity challenges about the game I think, that I’m not comfortable with really.
“It was a frustrating game (against Glasgow) to watch as a coach, it was a frustrating game to play in for players, equally I’m sure for you guys it was a frustrating game to watch from home. That would be my number one thing.”
Lancaster was asked to expand on his concerns surrounding ‘integrity’ challenges.
“I’d like to see the players just concentrate on playing the game,” he continued.
“This isn’t levelled at anyone in particular. Generally what it’s created is a sort of ‘appealing’ mentality. As a consequence, there’s definitely some issues there which are not in the values of the game.
Stuart Lancaster during a Leinster training session. Source: Tom O’Hanlon/INPHO
“I’d rather players concentrate on playing rugby and (let) the officials do their job. It’s been very difficult for the officials to manage this, they’ve not, to my knowledge, voted for it. I think it’s been very difficult to manage. With no crowds as well, there is a lot of noise from the sidelines trying to create the energy in the groups.
“We need a bit of a retake when the season finishes and just get back to accepting decisions, not appealing for everything, and getting on with the job of playing rugby in a way that is exciting and fun to watch without so much dead time.”
Instead of bringing in new laws, Lancaster feels more of a focus could be placed on some of the existing issues in the game.
“So I think doing that bit really well would solve a lot of the problems. So tackler out the back of the tackle and making sure that the assist tackler – is he legal, yeah – I think it would solve a lot of the sort of issues at the breakdown and the speed of ball becomes quicker.
“I don’t think that’s a change, I just think that’s a reinforcement. You see a lot of that refereed really well at the moment and if we can continue down that route then we’ll get a really good product.”